Jev duplicate decision errors
Duplicate decision processing happens when a webhook retries, a queue redelivers, or a client times out and sends the same ticket again. TypeSafe’s public API reference does not describe idempotency keys on POST /v1/systemone. Preventing doubles is your store: a unique work id and a recorded result.
This site does not sell, issue, or proxy TypeSafe keys. Authenticate with a credential you already have from the console or a documented gateway.
Related search language: Jev duplicate decision, TypeSafe Jev, Jev decision model, decision automation.
See also the error hub.
Jev duplicate decision errors: context
Retries of 429/529 are encouraged and can complete the original evaluation twice from the model’s point of view — that is usually fine (more input tokens) unless you also fired a side effect twice. Timeouts are the dangerous case: you do not know if the server finished.
Jev duplicate decision errors: inputs
Choose a natural key (vendor delivery id, ticket id + rubric version). Before POST, look up a completed decision. If present, return the stored answers. Send Jev the same filtered state when you do need a fresh call.
Do not stuff an idempotency header and assume TypeSafe honors it unless the official API page says so.
Jev duplicate decision errors: decision logic
States: pending, decided, failed_validation. Transition atomically. After answers, apply policy once. If a second worker wins the race, it should read the winner’s answers rather than overwrite with a later call (unless you explicitly want refresh).
Jev duplicate decision errors: implementation notes
Log both the work id and usage so finance can explain “why two charges for one ticket” when a timeout retry occurred.
We will not invent an official Idempotency-Key contract. Re-check docs.typesafe.ai/api if that changes.
Symptom → fix
| You see | Class | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| 401 | Unauthorized | Check Authorization: Bearer. Do not retry. This site cannot issue a key. |
| 422 | Invalid input / schema mismatch | Read the official field error; fix model, state, or question shape. |
| 429 / 529 | Rate limit / overload | Exponential backoff; honor retry-after. Official SDKs do this. |
| Client timeout | Your deadline | Fail closed on irreversible actions; optional SDK retry may duplicate work. |
200 + flat confidence or Noul ≈ 0.5 |
Low confidence (not HTTP) | Hold or route to a human. |
| Empty retriever / missing required fields | Retrieval / missing context | Do not call Jev, or ask a Noul “is enough information present?” |
| Your rules refuse the action | Policy block | Your enum — not a TypeSafe status. |
TypeSafe’s public error table lists 401, 422, 429, and 529 only. Channel-specific payment codes you see on other vendors are not a jev.pro IA clone — treat them as callouts in your wrapper.
FAQ
Is “Jev duplicate decision errors” always a TypeSafe HTTP status?
Only 401, 422, 429, and 529 appear in the public API error table. Low confidence, policy block, missing context, retrieval failure, and duplicates are application classes you define.
Should I retry the call?
Retry 429 and 529 with exponential backoff (official SDKs do). Do not retry 401 or 422. Client timeouts may retry in the SDK but can double side effects unless you are idempotent.
Where is the official error table?
The API reference. This page restates it for engineers and maps symptoms to fixes.
What this page does not claim
- Official TypeSafe status, logos, or support.
- That jev.pro sells, issues, or proxies API keys.
- Extra first-party HTTP routes beyond
POST /v1/systemoneandGET /v1/modelsunless the API reference lists them. - Invented latency SLOs, search volume, or unofficial prices. List price and rate limits are vendor claims — confirm on models.
- That a schema-constrained answer is automatically factually correct.
Disclaimer
This is an independent unofficial site and is not affiliated with TypeSafe AI; official documentation is available at https://docs.typesafe.ai.
Primary documentation: https://docs.typesafe.ai. Never treat jev.pro as TypeSafe official documentation. We do not sell, issue, or proxy API keys.
Sources
Public TypeSafe or adjacent documentation only. No private claims.