sgoedecke / system-one
OSS alternative — not TypeSafe Jev. This is a public GitHub System One–class / typed-decision replica. It is not Jev and not endorsed. Closed or no-repo competitors stay on Comparisons.
“Batched single-token choice inference for open language models, compatible with TypeSafe”
OSS alternatives rank #29In Eval #29
- 21Stars
- —Stars Δ / 1d
- —Stars Δ / 7d
- —Stars Δ / 30d
- 3Forks
- 1Watchers
GitHub ↗Official docs ↗Back to ranking
TL;DR
sgoedecke/system-one is an independent System One–class decision engine or interface clone. Useful to study. Not TypeSafe Jev, not RLCD, not a calibration transfer.
The author describes it as: “Batched single-token choice inference for open language models, compatible with TypeSafe” That is their claim, not a bench this site ran.
Who it’s for
- Researchers comparing a local or open decision engine to hosted Jev — never as a silent substitute
- Anyone who needs the unofficial line: jev.pro does not issue keys and is not TypeSafe
What’s inside
Top-level entries on GitHub at generation time: .gitignore, README.md, demo, docs, pyproject.toml, system_one, test_system_one.py. Read those before you trust a one-line install.
How to use
- Clone and follow the author’s Python toolchain. Do not invent a package name.
git clone https://github.com/sgoedecke/system-one.git
cd system-one
- If you compare to Jev, keep a
processorlabel so replica rows never read as Jev scores. - Send a complete
stateand typed questions. Code owns control flow after the probabilities.
This repository is not TypeSafe Jev. Hosted Jev, for comparison only, still looks like a function call:
{
model: "jev-1.13.0",
state: { source: "sgoedecke/system-one", brief: "..." },
questions: {
gate: { type: "noul", instructions: "Should we act on this state?" },
route: { type: "choice", instructions: "Pick one next system.", criteria: ["code", "review", "human"] },
},
}
Try this
Label a side-by-side, do not merge floors
Compare sgoedecke/system-one and hosted jev-1.13.0 on my 50 labeled tickets. Report agreement. Do not copy thresholds. Tag every row with processor=replica or processor=jev.
Schema-safe ≠ correct
On a case sgoedecke/system-one gets wrong, write down the schema-legal answer it returned and the human label. Do not “fix” it by asking Jev to generate an explanation.
FAQ
Can I treat these scores as Jev?
No. Label them as replica or local-engine results. Calibration does not transfer.
Does TypeSafe endorse it?
Their public docs index does not list it as Jev. We do not either.
Sources
Public repository metadata and TypeSafe documentation. No private claims.