skeptrunedev / jev-recruiter
“A Jev powered LinkedIn recruiting agent. Watch it browse relevant profiles, save links, and review evidence against your hiring brief.”
Jev-Based rank #51In Demo #12
- 43Stars
- —Stars Δ / 1d
- —Stars Δ / 7d
- —Stars Δ / 30d
- 8Forks
- 0Watchers
GitHub ↗Official docs ↗Back to ranking
TL;DR
skeptrunedev/jev-recruiter showed up as Jev / System One related work: Runnable demo or product experiment that uses Jev as a decision layer.
The author describes it as: “A Jev powered LinkedIn recruiting agent. Watch it browse relevant profiles, save links, and review evidence against your hiring brief.” That is their claim, not a bench this site ran.
Who it’s for
- Agent / harness authors who need a typed gate, route, or prune step
- Code-review and context-pruning workflows that must stay schema-bounded
- Anyone who needs the unofficial line: jev.pro does not issue keys and is not TypeSafe
What’s inside
Top-level entries on GitHub at generation time: .env.example, .gitignore, AGENTS.md, LICENSE, README.md, docs, examples, jev_ultrafast, pyproject.toml, scripts, tests, uv.lock. Read those before you trust a one-line install.
How to use
- Clone and follow the author’s Python toolchain. Do not invent a package name.
git clone https://github.com/skeptrunedev/jev-recruiter.git
cd jev-recruiter
- If the project calls hosted Jev, you still need a TypeSafe console key or a documented gateway.
- Send a complete
stateand typed questions. Code owns control flow after the probabilities.
Hosted Jev still looks like a function call — wrapper or not:
{
model: "jev-1.13.0",
state: { source: "skeptrunedev/jev-recruiter", brief: "..." },
questions: {
gate: { type: "noul", instructions: "Should we act on this state?" },
route: { type: "choice", instructions: "Pick one next system.", criteria: ["code", "review", "human"] },
},
}
Try this
Bound a review gate
Using skeptrunedev/jev-recruiter, draft one Choice question: keep / summarize / drop this tool result. State must include the command, the first 2k of output, and the original user task.
Schema-safe ≠ correct
On a case skeptrunedev/jev-recruiter gets wrong, write down the schema-legal answer it returned and the human label. Do not “fix” it by asking Jev to generate an explanation.
FAQ
Does this replace the TypeSafe SDK?
Only if the author implemented a full client. Most harnesses still call the vendor SDK or raw HTTP.
Are the star chips live?
Star, fork, and watcher chips refresh from the public GitHub API via a scheduled job. The prose on this page is editorial.
Sources
Public repository metadata and TypeSafe documentation. No private claims.