Use cases· Last updated

Onboarding evaluation with Jev

Checklists already track “watch the video / ship the laptop.” Jev reads “I’m stuck because…” and picks a helper queue (access, equipment, accommodation). It does not mark tasks done and it does not approve legal forms.

This unofficial page is the evaluation slice of the onboarding exception routing pack. Intent: apply the Jev (TypeSafe System One) decision model to onboarding exception routing evaluation. Primary search language: Onboarding Jev evaluation. Confirm patterns on docs.typesafe.ai. This site does not sell, issue, or proxy TypeSafe keys. Use a credential you already have from the console or a documented gateway.

Independent angle (cover ≠ clone): LMS/HRIS own task state; Jev routes free-text blockers. Not a checklist-clone or HRIS IA photocopy — I-9 and legal holds never Jev-only.

Onboarding use-case context

Evaluation for onboarding exception routing is a frozen harness, not a vibe check and not an opinion-blog “Jev review.” Labels: blocker-class gold from coordinators, plus accommodation gold (always human). We publish no unofficial accuracy.

Hub: Use cases. Compare, when the other tool is the real job: onboarding checklists.

Evaluation inputs

Replay the same contract you ship:

{
  "note": { "id": "ONB-55", "text": "I finished payroll forms at my last employer. Also I cannot sign in to the IdP on a screen reader." },
  "checklist": { "idp": "blocked", "laptop": "shipped" },
  "policy": { "access": "IdP or assistive-tech blockers go to IT-access, not LMS nudges." }
}

Freeze questions, criteria, and jev-1.13.0. Record the response model.

Decision signals and actions

Score these, not a blog-grade star rating:

Pair auto-act errors with handoff rate. If the onboarding coordinator router never acts, you have not evaluated onboarding exception routing — you have evaluated a human queue.

Do not treat a Noul of 0.5 as a “medium” onboarding exception routing score — it means yes and no are equally likely. Conjunctions stay in your code.

Guardrails and escalation

Promote a threshold only when the harness says auto-act error ≤ SLA and reviewers still catch the residual. TypeSafe’s confidence-gated examples use a lower bar for recoverable reads than for irreversible actions. Those numbers are illustrations. For onboarding exception routing, treat provision_access as the high bar (provisioning access or closing a legal form). Tune on labels — see offline evaluation.

Evaluation and rollout notes

After any criteria edit, rerun before production. Cookbook lifts you see on TypeSafe pages are vendor claims — re-measure on your new-hire or customer onboarding notes. Pin jev-1.13.0 (the versioned id) after you fit thresholds. jev-latest and the marketing line jev-1.13 can move. Log the response model. TypeSafe’s published list price for jev-1.13 is $0.042 per million input tokens (vendor claim — confirm on the models page); output tokens are free on that same page. Unused distractors still bill as input.

Official Python and JavaScript SDKs read TYPESAFE_API_KEY and retry documented 429/529. This site does not sell, issue, or proxy TypeSafe keys. Use a credential you already have from the console or a documented gateway.

Pack map

Slice Page
Graph and primitives decision workflow
What may enter state input contracts
What to gather first evidence collection
Atomic rules policy checks
Act / review / abstain confidence thresholds
Reviewer payload human handoff
What to persist audit trail
How it breaks failure modes
Labeled replay you are here
Shadow → canary production rollout

FAQ

Will jev.pro publish a leaderboard for this use case? No. Measure on your labels. Vendor cookbook figures stay labeled as vendor claims.

What must stay frozen? Questions, criteria, and the pinned model id. Aliases can move.

Where is the rest of the Onboarding pack? Start with Onboarding failure modes and Onboarding production rollout. Cluster hub: Use cases.

Employee or customer onboarding? Same pattern: checklist owns tasks; Jev routes leftover language. Keep legal holds out of auto-act.

Can Jev fill the I-9? No. Never Jev-only on statutory forms.

What this page does not claim

Disclaimer

This is an independent unofficial site and is not affiliated with TypeSafe AI; official documentation is available at https://docs.typesafe.ai.

Primary documentation: https://docs.typesafe.ai. Hub: Use cases.

Sources

Public TypeSafe or adjacent documentation only. No private claims.