Use cases· Last updated

Ads failure modes with Jev

Launching spend is irreversible. Jev judges creative copy and claims against your brand/legal excerpts. Bidding, budgets, and auction math stay in the ad platform.

This unofficial page is the failure modes slice of the ads creative and policy decisions pack. Intent: apply the Jev (TypeSafe System One) decision model to ads creative and policy decisions failure modes. Primary search language: Ads Jev failure modes. Confirm patterns on docs.typesafe.ai. This site does not sell, issue, or proxy TypeSafe keys. Use a credential you already have from the console or a documented gateway.

Independent angle (cover ≠ clone): Policy/compliance gates + spend irreversibility — not a clone of bidding-system IA or a rival ads recipe slug.

Ads use-case context

Ads creative and policy decisions breaks in product-specific ways. This page lists those modes so you can write tests — not a generic “AI can be wrong” essay, and not a rival limitations-page clone.

Hub: Use cases. Compare, when the other tool is the real job: ad bidding systems.

Failure Modes inputs

Many failures start as contract violations (distractors, missing ad creative + claim text). Canonical shape:

{
  "creative": { "id": "ad-441", "headline": "Lose 10kg this week", "body": "Guaranteed results." },
  "landing": { "claim": "Results vary; no guarantee." },
  "policy": { "health": "No absolute health outcome claims.", "superlatives": "No unsubstantiated #1 claims." }
}

Decision signals and actions

HTTP vs application:

You see Class Ads move
401 / 422 / 429 / 529 Documented HTTP Fix key/body or back off — errors
200 + flat confidence or Noul ≈ 0.5 Low confidence Hold; do not launch spend against a live campaign
Empty gather Missing evidence Skip Jev or ask “is enough information present?”

Do not treat a Noul of 0.5 as a “medium” ads creative and policy decisions score — it means yes and no are equally likely. Conjunctions stay in your code.

Guardrails and escalation

Fail closed: do not launch spend against a live campaign. Schema-safe answers are not factual correctness. TypeSafe’s confidence-gated examples use a lower bar for recoverable reads than for irreversible actions. Those numbers are illustrations. For ads creative and policy decisions, treat allow_launch as the high bar (spending against a live campaign). Tune on labels — see offline evaluation.

Evaluation and rollout notes

Your canary set should include each bullet above.

Pin jev-1.13.0 (the versioned id) after you fit thresholds. jev-latest and the marketing line jev-1.13 can move. Log the response model. TypeSafe’s published list price for jev-1.13 is $0.042 per million input tokens (vendor claim — confirm on the models page); output tokens are free on that same page. Unused distractors still bill as input.

Official Python and JavaScript SDKs read TYPESAFE_API_KEY and retry documented 429/529. This site does not sell, issue, or proxy TypeSafe keys. Use a credential you already have from the console or a documented gateway.

Pack map

Slice Page
Graph and primitives decision workflow
What may enter state input contracts
What to gather first evidence collection
Atomic rules policy checks
Act / review / abstain confidence thresholds
Reviewer payload human handoff
What to persist audit trail
How it breaks you are here
Labeled replay evaluation
Shadow → canary production rollout

FAQ

If the API returns 200, is the decision good? 200 only means the call parsed. Low confidence, Noul ≈ 0.5, or a policy miss are application failures.

Where do official weaknesses live? TypeSafe’s jev-1.13 jaggedness note — distractors, arithmetic, adversarial content. We do not invent more.

Where is the rest of the Ads pack? Start with Ads evaluation and Ads decision workflow. Cluster hub: Use cases.

Will Jev pause campaigns when CPA spikes? No. That is the ad platform / your rules. Jev judges language and policy fit.

Can we send images of the creative? Not to System One. Transcribe or paste the copy. Images are not accepted.

What this page does not claim

Disclaimer

This is an independent unofficial site and is not affiliated with TypeSafe AI; official documentation is available at https://docs.typesafe.ai.

Primary documentation: https://docs.typesafe.ai. Hub: Use cases.

Sources

Public TypeSafe or adjacent documentation only. No private claims.