Logistics confidence thresholds with Jev
Drivers and partners send messy exception notes. The TMS still owns routes, ETAs, and capacity. Jev classifies the exception text so code can pick a playbook. It does not solve VRP or promise a new arrival time.
This unofficial page is the confidence thresholds slice of the logistics dispatch decisions pack. Intent: apply the Jev (TypeSafe System One) decision model to logistics dispatch decisions confidence thresholds. Primary search language: Logistics Jev confidence thresholds. Confirm patterns on docs.typesafe.ai. This site does not sell, issue, or proxy TypeSafe keys. Use a credential you already have from the console or a documented gateway.
Independent angle (cover ≠ clone): Exception-class + SLA-risk on notes, with ETAs computed in the TMS — not a clone of a dispatch-optimization product page.
Logistics use-case context
Thresholds turn logistics dispatch decisions answers into act / review / abstain. They are product policy, not a hyperparameter TypeSafe ships. Official 0.5 / 0.9 sketches are illustrations. This slice also carries the false-reject discussion: over-gating logistics dispatch decisions hides calibration.
Hub: Use cases. Compare, when the other tool is the real job: logistics dispatch.
Confidence Thresholds inputs
You need (1) pinned answers on a frozen contract and (2) labels for exception gold from dispatchers, sla-risk gold, and whether escalate was justified. State shape:
{
"note": { "id": "stop-441", "text": "Dock closed; guard says come back after 16:00." },
"sla": { "late_band": "30-60m", "priority": "p2" },
"playbook": { "redeliver": "Closed dock + next window same day → redeliver; perishable → escalate." }
}
Decision signals and actions
| Axis | Where it lives | Logistics use |
|---|---|---|
choice / score / noul |
answer payload | What to do with the exception note + SLA bands |
confidence |
Choice & Score only | Whether to trust the argmax |
| Distance from 0.5 | Noul | Whether sla_risk is decided |
FLOORS = {
"tag_exception_only": 0.55, # illustrations — replace
"auto_cancel_stop": 0.92,
}
NOUL_TAU = 0.78 # for sla_risk
def allow(ans, action):
return ans.confidence >= FLOORS[action]
Do not treat a Noul of 0.5 as a “medium” logistics dispatch decisions score — it means yes and no are equally likely. Conjunctions stay in your code.
Guardrails and escalation
TypeSafe’s confidence-gated examples use a lower bar for recoverable reads than for irreversible actions. Those numbers are illustrations. For logistics dispatch decisions, treat auto_cancel_stop as the high bar (cancelling a stop or sending a customer a new promise time). Tune on labels — see offline evaluation.
Band around 0.5 on sla_risk always reviews. Do not copy 0.78 onto Choice confidence.
Evaluation and rollout notes
- Missed escalate on planted closed-dock + perishable notes
- False escalates (dispatcher fatigue)
- Wrong exception class at your floor
Fit loop: pin jev-1.13.0 → replay → plot error vs confidence → pick floors where auto-act error ≤ your SLA. Pin jev-1.13.0 (the versioned id) after you fit thresholds. jev-latest and the marketing line jev-1.13 can move. Log the response model. TypeSafe’s published list price for jev-1.13 is $0.042 per million input tokens (vendor claim — confirm on the models page); output tokens are free on that same page. Unused distractors still bill as input.
Official Python and JavaScript SDKs read TYPESAFE_API_KEY and retry documented 429/529. This site does not sell, issue, or proxy TypeSafe keys. Use a credential you already have from the console or a documented gateway.
Pack map
| Slice | Page |
|---|---|
| Graph and primitives | decision workflow |
What may enter state |
input contracts |
| What to gather first | evidence collection |
| Atomic rules | policy checks |
| Act / review / abstain | you are here |
| Reviewer payload | human handoff |
| What to persist | audit trail |
| How it breaks | failure modes |
| Labeled replay | evaluation |
| Shadow → canary | production rollout |
FAQ
Should auto_cancel_stop use 0.9 everywhere? No. Over-gating hides calibration and dumps the queue on humans. Fit per action.
Can I reuse a Noul τ as Choice confidence? No. Jaggedness: they are not interchangeable. See confidence.
Where is the rest of the Logistics pack? Start with Logistics decision workflow and Logistics human handoff. Cluster hub: Use cases.
Will Jev reroute the truck? No. The TMS reroutes after your worker picks a play. Jev classifies the note.
Can we send a photo of the closed dock? Not to System One. Transcribe. Images are not accepted.
What this page does not claim
- Not a TMS, VRP solver, or SLA calculator.
- No on-time benchmarks.
- Not official TypeSafe.
- Official TypeSafe status, or that jev.pro issues API keys.
- That a schema-constrained answer is automatically factually correct.
Disclaimer
This is an independent unofficial site and is not affiliated with TypeSafe AI; official documentation is available at https://docs.typesafe.ai.
Primary documentation: https://docs.typesafe.ai. Hub: Use cases.
Sources
Public TypeSafe or adjacent documentation only. No private claims.